Refactor pop_int.

I don't like passing the stack through isnt_int but that let's you chain
with andThen.

There's probably a clever or idiomatic way to not do that and couple the
stack to the result without passing it through the type checker function
but I don't know what it is right now, and this works.

implementations/Elm/src/Joy.elm

@@ -1,8 +1,8 @@
 module Joy exposing (doit)
 
-import String exposing (replace, words)
-import Result exposing (andThen)
 import Bitwise
+import Result exposing (andThen)
+import String exposing (replace, words)
 
 
 type JoyType
@@ -64,21 +64,36 @@ push_int i stack = (JoyInt i) :: stack
 
 
 pop_int : (List JoyType) -> Result String (Int, List JoyType)
-pop_int stack =
+pop_int stack = pop_any stack |> andThen isnt_int
+
+--    case stack of
+--        [] -> Err "Not enough values on Stack"
+--        h :: t ->
+--            case h of
+--                JoyInt i ->
+--                    Ok (i, t)
+--                _ ->
+--                    Err "Not an integer."
+
+
+pop_any : (List JoyType) -> Result String (JoyType,  List JoyType)
+pop_any stack =
         case stack of
-        [] -> Err "Not enough values on Stack"
-        h :: t ->
-            case h of
+                [] ->
+                        Err "Not enough values on Stack"
+                item :: rest ->
+                        Ok (item, rest)
+
+isnt_int : (JoyType,  List JoyType) -> Result String (Int, List JoyType)
+isnt_int (item, stack) =
+        case item of
                 JoyInt i ->
-                    Ok (i, t)
+                        Ok (i, stack)
                 _ ->
                         Err "Not an integer."
 
 
 
-
-
-
 -- Printer
 
 joyTermToString : JoyType -> String